NULL指针的访问异常是C程序员常见的bug，事实上部分情况下空指针可以解引用，下面的thread，列出了几个例子。

    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6793262/why-dereferencing-a-null-pointer-is-undefined-behaviour

    On the PDP-11, it happened that address 0 always contained the value 0, so dereferencing a null pointer also gave the value 0. Quite a few people who used these machines felt that since they were the original machine C had been written on/used to program, that this should be considered canonical behavior for C on all machines (even though it originally happened quite accidentally).

    On some other machines (Interdata comes to mind, though my memory could easily be wrong) address 0 was put to normal use, so it could contain other values.

    There was also some hardware on which address 0 was actually some memory-mapped hardware, so reading/writing it did special things -- not at all equivalent to reading/writing normal memory at all.

    空指针解引用是否导致异常应该是硬件设备和OS组合决定的。以前在VXwork下工作，空指针也可以解引用，可以访问内存0地址，还可以修改内容。这种情况下，为了便于程序员debug，印象中我们大概是采用了对于0地址内容监控，如果内容有改动则报告或者crash。

建议继续学习：

1. Linus：利用二级指针删除单向链表    (阅读：11133)
2. C语言结构体里的成员数组和指针    (阅读：4581)
3. 通过引用计数解决野指针的问题(C&C++)    (阅读：3354)
4. C 语言中统一的函数指针    (阅读：2964)
5. cpp智能指针的简单实现    (阅读：2919)
6. 重构发现：指针操作问题    (阅读：2272)
7. 关于类成员函数指针的正确写法    (阅读：1918)
8. 一起空指针引发的程序问题的排查过程    (阅读：1890)