一直很想知道，在 http 1.1 中的长连接功能，如果在理想的环境中，对性能的影响。所以简单的做了一下测试
未使用长连接
Concurrency Level: 200
Time taken for tests: 7.016 seconds
Complete requests: 30000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 134524481 bytes
HTML transferred: 122884096 bytes
Requests per second: 4275.85 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 46.774 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.234 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 18724.15 [Kbytes/sec] received使用长连接
Concurrency Level: 200
Time taken for tests: 5.006 seconds
Complete requests: 30000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Keep-Alive requests: 30000
Total transferred: 135338747 bytes
HTML transferred: 123486848 bytes
Requests per second: 5992.49 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 33.375 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.167 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 26400.24 [Kbytes/sec] received由上面可以看出，在理想的环境中，如果打开长连接，可以处理6k/s 的响应，如果关掉长连接，只能处理4.2k/s 的响应。我想实际的环境影响一定小很多。。但一定程度的说明长连接还是相当有用的。
换 2.7 的 squid 测试
Requests per second: 6004.86 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 8680.81 [#/sec] (mean)这个更新明显，有 3k 的差别了。。。